China vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
China
81.61
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
81.25
in 2019
China rank
84th
Papua New Guinea rank
85th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- China
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
China currently reports 81.61 against 81.25 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
China ranks 84th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), China or Papua New Guinea?
- China, at 81.61 against 81.25 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between China and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.36, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- China ranks 84th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.