Central African Republic vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Central African Republic
85
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
85
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
67th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
67th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Central African Republic
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 85 against 85 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 67th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Central African Republic or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Central African Republic, at 85 against 85 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Central African Republic and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Central African Republic ranks 67th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.