Cape Verde vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Cape Verde
68.75
in 2019
Comoros
69
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
127th
Comoros rank
126th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Comoros
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 69 against 68.75 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.25.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 127th and Comoros ranks 126th of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Cape Verde or Comoros?
Comoros, at 69 against 68.75 in Cape Verde as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Cape Verde and Comoros?
0.25, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Comoros?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Cape Verde ranks 127th and Comoros ranks 126th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.