Brunei Darussalam vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Brunei Darussalam
77.5
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
78.75
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
98th
Equatorial Guinea rank
96th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 78.75 against 77.5 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 1.25.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 98th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 96th of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Brunei Darussalam or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 78.75 against 77.5 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Brunei Darussalam and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.25, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 98th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 96th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.