Bolivia vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Bolivia
93.75
in 2019
Marshall Islands, Republic of the
95
in 2019
Bolivia rank
27th
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
25th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Bolivia
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
How they compare
Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 95 against 93.75 in Bolivia, a difference of 1.25.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Marshall Islands, Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 27th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 25th of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands, Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Bolivia or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 95 against 93.75 in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Bolivia and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 1.25, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Bolivia ranks 27th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 25th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.