Argentina vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Argentina
85
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
85
in 2019
Argentina rank
66th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
66th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Argentina
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 85 against 85 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 66th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Argentina or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Argentina, at 85 against 85 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Argentina and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Argentina ranks 66th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.