Poland vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Poland
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 47.25 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 47.25 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 170th and Serbia ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Poland or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 47.25 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Poland and Serbia?
- 47.25 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Poland ranks 170th and Serbia ranks 167th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.