Philippines vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Philippines
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 467.5 DB16-20 methodology against 456 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 11.5 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Philippines or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 467.5 DB16-20 methodology against 456 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Philippines and Suriname?
- 11.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Philippines ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.