Mongolia vs Nicaragua: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Mongolia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 240 DB16-20 methodology against 225.11 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 14.89 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 189 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Mongolia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 240 DB16-20 methodology against 225.11 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Mongolia and Nicaragua?
- 14.89 DB16-20 methodology, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Nicaragua rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Mongolia ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.