Malta vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Malta
- Zambia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 370 DB16-20 methodology against 370 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 77th and Zambia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Malta or Zambia?
- Malta, at 370 DB16-20 methodology against 370 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Malta and Zambia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Malta ranks 77th and Zambia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.