Guinea-Bissau vs Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Libya
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 585 DB16-20 methodology against 574.86 DB16-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 10.14 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 43rd and Libya ranks 45th of 189 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Guinea-Bissau or Libya?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 585 DB16-20 methodology against 574.86 DB16-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Guinea-Bissau and Libya?
- 10.14 DB16-20 methodology, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Libya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 43rd and Libya ranks 45th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.