Cape Verde vs Kuwait: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Cape Verde
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 665 DB16-20 methodology against 641 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde, a difference of 24 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Kuwait ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Cape Verde or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 665 DB16-20 methodology against 641 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Cape Verde and Kuwait?
- 24 DB16-20 methodology, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Kuwait?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Kuwait rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Kuwait ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.