Belarus vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Belarus
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 75 DB16-20 methodology against 65 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus, a difference of 10 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 160th and Ukraine ranks 158th of 189 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Belarus or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 75 DB16-20 methodology against 65 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Belarus and Ukraine?
- 10 DB16-20 methodology, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ukraine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Belarus ranks 160th and Ukraine ranks 158th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.