Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Türkiye: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
67.92
in 2019
Türkiye
68.11
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
103rd
Türkiye rank
102nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 68.11 against 67.92 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.19.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 103rd and Türkiye ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 68.11 against 67.92 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Türkiye?
- 0.19, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Türkiye?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Türkiye rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 103rd and Türkiye ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.