Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Taiwan, China: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
68.4
in 2019
Taiwan, China
68.36
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
98th
Taiwan, China rank
100th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 68.4 against 68.36 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th and Taiwan, China ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Taiwan, China?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 68.4 against 68.36 in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan, China?
- 0.04, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan, China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan, China rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th and Taiwan, China ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.