Saudi Arabia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Saudi Arabia
69.91
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
68.4
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
98th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 69.91 against 68.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Saudi Arabia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saudi Arabia, at 69.91 against 68.4 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.51, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.