Russian Federation vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Russian Federation
45.28
in 2019
Sierra Leone
47.94
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
145th
Sierra Leone rank
142nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Russian Federation
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 47.94 against 45.28 in Russian Federation, a difference of 2.66.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 145th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 190 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Russian Federation or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 47.94 against 45.28 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Russian Federation and Sierra Leone?
- 2.66, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Sierra Leone?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Russian Federation ranks 145th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.