Papua New Guinea vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Papua New Guinea
33.96
in 2019
Saint Lucia
32.31
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
160th
Saint Lucia rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 33.96 against 32.31 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 1.65.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Saint Lucia ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Papua New Guinea or Saint Lucia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 33.96 against 32.31 in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Papua New Guinea and Saint Lucia?
- 1.65, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Saint Lucia ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.