Micronesia, Federated States of vs United States: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Micronesia, Federated States of
84.15
in 2019
United States
83.49
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
55th
United States rank
57th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- United States
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 84.15 against 83.49 in United States, a difference of 0.66.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 55th and United States ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Micronesia, Federated States of or United States?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 84.15 against 83.49 in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Micronesia, Federated States of and United States?
- 0.66, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and United States?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and United States rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 55th and United States ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.