Malawi vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Malawi
77.08
in 2019
Mongolia
78.76
in 2019
Malawi rank
70th
Mongolia rank
67th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Malawi
  • Mongolia
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 78.76 against 77.08 in Malawi, a difference of 1.68.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 70th and Mongolia ranks 67th of 188 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Malawi or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 78.76 against 77.08 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Malawi and Mongolia?
1.68, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mongolia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Malawi ranks 70th and Mongolia ranks 67th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.