Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Latvia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
86.79
in 2019
Latvia
85.85
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
46th
Latvia rank
48th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Latvia
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 86.79 against 85.85 in Latvia, a difference of 0.94.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 46th and Latvia ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Latvia?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 86.79 against 85.85 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Latvia?
- 0.94, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Latvia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 46th and Latvia ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.