Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
90.09
in 2019
North Macedonia
90.33
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
38th
North Macedonia rank
36th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 90.33 against 90.09 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.24.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 38th and North Macedonia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 90.33 against 90.09 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and North Macedonia?
- 0.24, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 38th and North Macedonia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.