Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
60.81
in 2019
Kiribati
60.38
in 2019
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
120th
Kiribati rank
121st
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 60.81 against 60.38 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.43.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 121st of 190 countries.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Kiribati?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 60.81 against 60.38 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kiribati?
- 0.43, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kiribati?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kiribati rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 121st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.