Guyana vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Guyana
55.87
in 2019
Philippines
56.98
in 2019
Guyana rank
129th
Philippines rank
126th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Guyana
  • Philippines
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 56.98 against 55.87 in Guyana, a difference of 1.11.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 129th and Philippines ranks 126th of 188 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Guyana or Philippines?
Philippines, at 56.98 against 55.87 in Guyana as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Guyana and Philippines?
1.11, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Philippines?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guyana and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Guyana ranks 129th and Philippines ranks 126th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.