Guinea-Bissau vs Russian Federation: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Guinea-Bissau
44.81
in 2019
Russian Federation
45.28
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
147th
Russian Federation rank
146th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 45.28 against 44.81 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Russian Federation ranks 146th of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Guinea-Bissau or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 45.28 against 44.81 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
- 0.47, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Russian Federation ranks 146th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.