Guatemala vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Guatemala
70.75
in 2019
Mauritius
71.45
in 2019
Guatemala rank
89th
Mauritius rank
87th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mauritius
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 71.45 against 70.75 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.7.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 89th and Mauritius ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Guatemala or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 71.45 against 70.75 in Guatemala as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Guatemala and Mauritius?
0.7, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritius?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Guatemala ranks 89th and Mauritius ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.