Eswatini vs Kenya: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Eswatini
87.32
in 2019
Kenya
86.56
in 2019
Eswatini rank
44th
Kenya rank
46th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Eswatini
  • Kenya
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 87.32 against 86.56 in Kenya, a difference of 0.76.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Kenya ranks 46th of 188 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Eswatini or Kenya?
Eswatini, at 87.32 against 86.56 in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Eswatini and Kenya?
0.76, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kenya?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Kenya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Kenya ranks 46th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.