Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16
Equatorial Guinea
28.3
in 2019
Namibia
29.72
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd
Namibia rank
161st
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 29.72 against 28.3 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.42.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 161st of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 29.72 against 28.3 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 1.42, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 161st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.