Ecuador vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Ecuador
47.17
in 2019
Senegal
48.42
in 2019
Ecuador rank
142nd
Senegal rank
140th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Ecuador
  • Senegal
01020304050201420162019

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 48.42 against 47.17 in Ecuador, a difference of 1.25.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 142nd and Senegal ranks 140th of 188 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Ecuador or Senegal?
Senegal, at 48.42 against 47.17 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Ecuador and Senegal?
1.25, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Ecuador ranks 142nd and Senegal ranks 140th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.