Dominican Republic vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Dominican Republic
54.01
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
52.97
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
135th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
138th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 54.01 against 52.97 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 135th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Dominican Republic or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Dominican Republic, at 54.01 against 52.97 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.04, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 135th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.