Democratic Republic of Congo vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16
Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2019
Uruguay
2.08
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
177th
Uruguay rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 2.08 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 2.08.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 177th and Uruguay ranks 176th of 188 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Democratic Republic of Congo or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 2.08 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay?
- 2.08, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 177th and Uruguay ranks 176th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.