Democratic Republic of Congo vs Congo: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2019
Congo
0
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
177th
Congo rank
177th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Congo
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Congo, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 177th and Congo ranks 177th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Democratic Republic of Congo or Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0 against 0 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 177th and Congo ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.