Chad vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Chad
69.91
in 2019
Seychelles
68.65
in 2019
Chad rank
93rd
Seychelles rank
95th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Chad
  • Seychelles
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Chad currently reports 69.91 against 68.65 in Seychelles, a difference of 1.26.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 93rd and Seychelles ranks 95th of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Chad or Seychelles?
Chad, at 69.91 against 68.65 in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Chad and Seychelles?
1.26, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Seychelles?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chad and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Chad ranks 93rd and Seychelles ranks 95th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.