Cameroon vs Grenada: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Cameroon
7.29
in 2019
Grenada
2.41
in 2019
Cameroon rank
174th
Grenada rank
175th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Cameroon
  • Grenada
234567201420162019

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 7.29 against 2.41 in Grenada, a difference of 4.88.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 3.0 times Grenada's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 174th and Grenada ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Cameroon or Grenada?
Cameroon, at 7.29 against 2.41 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Cameroon and Grenada?
4.88, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Grenada?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Grenada rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Cameroon ranks 174th and Grenada ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.