Cape Verde vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Cape Verde
39.53
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
33.96
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
157th
Papua New Guinea rank
160th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Cape Verde
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 39.53 against 33.96 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 5.57.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Cape Verde or Papua New Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 39.53 against 33.96 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Cape Verde and Papua New Guinea?
- 5.57, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Cape Verde ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.