Bangladesh vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Bangladesh
61.49
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
60.81
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
120th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
121st
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Bangladesh
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 61.49 against 60.81 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.68.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 120th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 121st of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Bangladesh or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Bangladesh, at 61.49 against 60.81 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Bangladesh and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.68, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Bangladesh ranks 120th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 121st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.