Australia vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Australia
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of currently reports 29.34 against 27.74 in Australia, a difference of 1.6.
That makes Mauritania, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 167th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 164th of 190 countries.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Australia or Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, at 29.34 against 27.74 in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Australia and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 1.6, with Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Australia ranks 167th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 164th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.