Sudan vs United States: Total Reserves, per unit of GDP
Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2017
United States
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sudan rank
163rd
United States rank
162nd
Total Reserves, per unit of GDP over time
- Sudan
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes United States's figure about 2.0 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 163rd and United States ranks 162nd of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per unit of gdp, Sudan or United States?
- United States, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per unit of gdp between Sudan and United States?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and United States?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Sudan and United States rank globally for total reserves, per unit of gdp?
- Sudan ranks 163rd and United States ranks 162nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.