Dominica vs North Macedonia: Total Reserves, per unit of GDP
Dominica
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2018
North Macedonia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Dominica rank
33rd
North Macedonia rank
34th
Total Reserves, per unit of GDP over time
- Dominica
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Dominica ranks 33rd and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 164 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per unit of gdp, Dominica or North Macedonia?
- Dominica, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per unit of gdp between Dominica and North Macedonia?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Dominica and North Macedonia rank globally for total reserves, per unit of gdp?
- Dominica ranks 33rd and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.