Australia vs Venezuela: Total Reserves, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Venezuela
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2016
Australia rank
147th
Venezuela rank
150th
Total Reserves, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Venezuela
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Venezuela, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Venezuela's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Venezuela ahead.
Australia ranks 147th and Venezuela ranks 150th of 164 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Venezuela |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Venezuela |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per unit of gdp, Australia or Venezuela?
- Australia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Venezuela as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per unit of gdp between Australia and Venezuela?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Venezuela?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Australia and Venezuela rank globally for total reserves, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 147th and Venezuela ranks 150th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.