Oman vs Romania: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Oman
0.0655 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Romania
0.0629 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
86th
Romania rank
87th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Oman
- Romania
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.0655 units per square kilometre against 0.0629 units per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0026 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Oman ranks 86th and Romania ranks 87th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0187 units per square kilometre | 0.0262 units per square kilometre | 0.0075 units per square kilometre | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.0516 units per square kilometre | 0.044 units per square kilometre | 0.0076 units per square kilometre | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Oman or Romania?
- Oman, at 0.0655 units per square kilometre against 0.0629 units per square kilometre in Romania as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Oman and Romania?
- 0.0026 units per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Romania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Oman and Romania rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Oman ranks 86th and Romania ranks 87th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.