Malawi vs Zambia: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Malawi
0.0064 units per square kilometre
in 2014
Zambia
0.0045 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
142nd
Zambia rank
144th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0064 units per square kilometre against 0.0045 units per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0019 units per square kilometre.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 142nd and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 units per square kilometre | 0.001 units per square kilometre | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0037 units per square kilometre | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Malawi or Zambia?
- Malawi, at 0.0064 units per square kilometre against 0.0045 units per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Malawi and Zambia?
- 0.0019 units per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Malawi ranks 142nd and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.