Libya vs East Timor: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Libya
0.0376 units per square kilometre
in 2016
East Timor
0.0453 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Libya rank
108th
East Timor rank
105th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Libya
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0.0453 units per square kilometre against 0.0376 units per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0077 units per square kilometre.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 108th and East Timor ranks 105th of 164 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0306 units per square kilometre | 0.0102 units per square kilometre | 0.0204 units per square kilometre | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0542 units per square kilometre | 0.0333 units per square kilometre | 0.0209 units per square kilometre | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Libya or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0.0453 units per square kilometre against 0.0376 units per square kilometre in Libya as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Libya and East Timor?
- 0.0077 units per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Libya and East Timor rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Libya ranks 108th and East Timor ranks 105th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.