Liberia vs Zambia: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Liberia
0.0058 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Zambia
0.0045 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia rank
143rd
Zambia rank
144th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Liberia
- Zambia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.0058 units per square kilometre against 0.0045 units per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0013 units per square kilometre.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
Liberia ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | 0.001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0057 units per square kilometre | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | 0.0023 units per square kilometre | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Liberia or Zambia?
- Liberia, at 0.0058 units per square kilometre against 0.0045 units per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Liberia and Zambia?
- 0.0013 units per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Liberia and Zambia rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Liberia ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.