Liberia vs Malawi: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Liberia
0.0058 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Malawi
0.0064 units per square kilometre
in 2014
Liberia rank
143rd
Malawi rank
142nd
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Liberia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0064 units per square kilometre against 0.0058 units per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.0006 units per square kilometre.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Liberia ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 142nd of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | 0.0019 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0054 units per square kilometre | 0.0037 units per square kilometre | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Liberia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.0064 units per square kilometre against 0.0058 units per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Liberia and Malawi?
- 0.0006 units per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Malawi?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
- How do Liberia and Malawi rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Liberia ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 142nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.