Latvia vs South Africa: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Latvia
0.0527 units per square kilometre
in 2016
South Africa
0.0515 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
98th
South Africa rank
99th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Latvia
- South Africa
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0527 units per square kilometre against 0.0515 units per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0012 units per square kilometre.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 98th and South Africa ranks 99th of 164 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.049 units per square kilometre | 0.0164 units per square kilometre | 0.0326 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0861 units per square kilometre | 0.0395 units per square kilometre | 0.0466 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Latvia or South Africa?
- Latvia, at 0.0527 units per square kilometre against 0.0515 units per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Latvia and South Africa?
- 0.0012 units per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Latvia ranks 98th and South Africa ranks 99th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.