Latvia vs Rwanda: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Latvia
0.0527 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Rwanda
0.0549 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Latvia rank
98th
Rwanda rank
96th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0549 units per square kilometre against 0.0527 units per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0022 units per square kilometre.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.049 units per square kilometre | 0.0177 units per square kilometre | 0.0313 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0861 units per square kilometre | 0.032 units per square kilometre | 0.0541 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.0549 units per square kilometre against 0.0527 units per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0.0022 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.