Laos vs Zambia: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Laos
0.0038 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Zambia
0.0045 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Laos rank
146th
Zambia rank
144th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Laos
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.0045 units per square kilometre against 0.0038 units per square kilometre in Laos, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 146th and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.001 units per square kilometre | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | Laos |
| 2010s | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Laos or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.0045 units per square kilometre against 0.0038 units per square kilometre in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Laos and Zambia?
- 0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Laos and Zambia rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Laos ranks 146th and Zambia ranks 144th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.