Israel vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income): Total Reserves, per square kilometre

Israel
5.33 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
0.0386 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Israel rank
6th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) rank
9th

Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
0246199020042018

How they compare

Israel currently reports 5.33 units per square kilometre against 0.0386 units per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 5.29 units per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 138.0 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 6th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 9th of 164 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.49 units per square kilometre 0.024 units per square kilometre 1.46 units per square kilometre Israel
2010s 3.8 units per square kilometre 0.0468 units per square kilometre 3.75 units per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Israel or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
Israel, at 5.33 units per square kilometre against 0.0386 units per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Israel and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
5.29 units per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do Israel and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 6th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 9th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income): Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/israel/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/israel/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-excluding-high-income/">Israel vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income): Total Reserves, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 4,193 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.