Iceland vs Rwanda: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Iceland
0.0563 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0549 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Iceland rank
94th
Rwanda rank
96th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Iceland
- Rwanda
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0563 units per square kilometre against 0.0549 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0014 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Iceland ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0162 units per square kilometre | 0.0177 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0569 units per square kilometre | 0.0363 units per square kilometre | 0.0206 units per square kilometre | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Iceland or Rwanda?
- Iceland, at 0.0563 units per square kilometre against 0.0549 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Iceland and Rwanda?
- 0.0014 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Rwanda rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Iceland ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.